On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:09:37PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 03/03/2020 à 23:37, tekHedd a écrit : > > > > So, I would consider rewriting polkit and dbus from scratch. > > > > Also, who has time to rewrite polkit and dbus from scratch?
What are the actual requirements for a dbus-like system? Requirements that would allow a completely different design? > > * dbus probably not salvageable, also deeply integrated into every > > possible program; consider dbus compatibility shim D: > By definition, a shim preserves the API, and I consider the problem of > Dbus is precisely its API. Preserving the API would not be done by the new system; the shim is to allow old software to continue running until it was rewritten. (And yes, I know there's nothing so permanent as a temporary building.) -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
