Quoting Rainer Weikusat via Dng ([email protected]): > But this is not the case. There's nothing which stops users from running > their own, fully capable resolver locally[*] (or somewhere on a local > network) and thus, not make a comprehensive browsing history available > to any third party.
Reminder, I maintain a bestiary of all 'DNS Server (and Related) Software for Linux' by category, here: http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Network_Other/dns-servers.html Candidate (maintained) open source recursive resolvers for Linux are: o bind9 (has baggage; see page) o Deadwood o dnscache (from djbdns), if patched to modern standards o PowerDNS Recursor o Unbound For various reasons out of scope here, I would generally recommend Unbound. (I'm sure Deadwood is really good and competitive, but am unsure of its packaging status. Disclaimer: Sam Trenholme, author of Deadwood and MaraDNS, is a friend of mine.) > [*] Except systemd-resolvd, of course, at that's (reportedly) a stub > resolver to replace another stub resolver :->. Correct. -- Cheers, "Why doesn't anyone invite copyeditors to parties, Rick Moen when we're such cool people out with whom to hang?" [email protected] -- @laureneoneal (Lauren O'Neal) McQ! (4x80) _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
