On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 22:07 -0800, Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Dimitris via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org): > > > so, i would be interested to know, if there's a privacy issue with > > opennnic? > > I have no problem with people who decide to adopt alternate roots. > > What I was talking about upthread was outsourcing one's recursive > nameservice to OpenNIC's public recursive nameserver IPs, or any > other > stranger's. Because, well, why? Recursive service is dead-easy to > do > with one's local computing resources, protecting one's autonomy, > security, performance, and privacy just that tiny bit more.
I agree actually. I run my own recursive nameserver (bind9) that points to opennic's root servers. I don't share it with opennic yet because I have yet to get doh and or dot setup yet. I got started on it but it had to take a back seat for a while. I've also been keeping logs for my own purposes and want to not keep logs when I advertise it on openvpn. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
