On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 22:07 -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Dimitris via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> 
> > so, i would be interested to know, if there's a privacy issue with
> > opennnic?
> 
> I have no problem with people who decide to adopt alternate roots.
> 
> What I was talking about upthread was outsourcing one's recursive
> nameservice to OpenNIC's public recursive nameserver IPs, or any
> other
> stranger's.  Because, well, why?  Recursive service is dead-easy to
> do
> with one's local computing resources, protecting one's autonomy,
> security, performance, and privacy just that tiny bit more.

I agree actually. I run my own recursive nameserver (bind9) that points
to opennic's root servers. I don't share it with opennic yet because I
have yet to get doh and or dot setup yet. I got started on it but it
had to take a back seat for a while. I've also been keeping logs for my
own purposes and want to not keep logs when I advertise it on openvpn.



_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to