The paper mentions that RRsets are canonicalised before being de-duped. It mentions that the names are downcased and then the RRs sorted by data-value. Does the downcasing also apply to the names in the data section?
Are the labels also fully de-compressed at this stage? or could differences in compression and case cause duplication? I'm curious if you've observed any differences in how compression is applied. On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Robert Edmonds <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > > i've written a technical whitepaper on the architecture of ISC's Passive > DNS implementation, available here: > > http://users.isc.org/~edmonds/passive-dns-architecture.pdf > > comments and feedback welcome. > > -- > Robert Edmonds > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs -- Colm _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
