On 5/16/12 4:31 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > [And FWIW I very much doubt the vanity TLD madness will continue long > enough for the root zone grow to anywhere like that size: maybe a few > thousand new TLDs at most.]
while linguistic and cultural applications are similar to iso3166 allocations, and therefore limited to some low multiple of the iso3166 allocations, and ascii encoded non-ascii applications are also similar to iso3166 allocations and similarly limited, and purpose applications, municipal, regional or industry segment are similarly limited, constituting in sum a bounded set of some low multiple of the current iso3166 allocations, brand applications are unbounded in number and new brands are constantly created. if the representations of the body responsible for soliciting two thousand applications concerning process and risk cost estimation are implemented, the entry cost in the future may be significantly less than it is in 2012. note that having participated in every general meeting since the san juan meeting to the singapore meeting, and having closely read each version of the draft applicant guidebook, at no point did i observe policy for a type of application for which the registration, transfer, and other policies intended to meet a brand-restricted operational practice and rules for registry and registrar operators under consideration. -e _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
