IMHO, documenting the best practice may sound like a good idea. There are all kinds of people around the world. At least it can guide the good guy.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Conrad > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 4:03 AM > To: Andrew Sullivan > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dns-operations] Documenting root slave operation Re: The (very) > uneven distribution of DNS root servers on the Internet > > Andrew, > > On May 17, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > What is this supposed to solve? > > From earlier in the thread: > > > - increased resilience to DoS attack > > - reduced dependence on a single point (ok, 13 points) of failure > > - potentially improved performance > > - greater autonomy > > - reduced political whinage about not having a root server > > - greater openness and transparency > > If I'm reading your comments correctly, you're suggesting the right answer is to > not document best practices for slaving the root and let folks figure it out on > their own? > > Regards, > -drc > > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
