On 5/24/2012 11:08 PM, paul vixie wrote: > On 5/25/2012 1:38 AM, Ryan Rawdon wrote: >> ... So here are the questions I am left with right now: >> - Should a packet with the truncate bit set contain answers, or is this >> optional? I'm guessing optional, but could see arguments for the UDP >> response with the truncate bit containing at least the first few RRs > the answers are optional. > >> - Should a packet with the truncate bit set have the field for the number of >> Answers reflect how many answers are in that packet, or how many are in the >> actual forthcoming response? I believe that it should contain the number of >> RRs contained in the UDP response itself, not the full answer to the query - >> and this is where I believe the Amazon response is malformed. In the UDP >> response it says there are 24 answer RRs when there are zero > the header counts must match the actual contents but the > prospective/desired contents, or else the response is malformed.
There was supposed to be a "not" somewhere in this sentence? > paul > _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
