On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:40:06 +0200, Miek Gieben <[email protected]> said: > [ Quoting <[email protected]> in "Re: [dns-operations] Summary: Anyon..." ] >> On 14. 10. 2012, at 13:37, Carlos M. Martinez <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > That could be a really interesting project. I'm not sure how can I >> > contribute, but I'd love to see that happen. >> >> Even helping defining requirements (when we start gathering them) would be >> tremendous help...
> Indeed, sounds like a really interesting project. > But why would a hardware implementation be better than, for instance, SoftHSM? A hardware HSM allows you to detect when your keys get stolen (provided the hardware does not implement extraction of the keys, of course). In our case, this is the *only* reason we use a HSM at all. -- Alex _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
