On 2013/01/10, at 16:53, Phil Pennock wrote: > Anyone know of any resolvers that suffer horribly and die when presented > with an NS host which is AAAA-only?
>From the perspective of a v4-only resolver, that would look like a lame >delegation. Is the whole NS set v6-only, or just the one name server? If >it's the whole NS set it wouldn't surprise me to find a few implementations >that become a bit pathological about trying to get the address records. I'd >expect those implementations to try resolving the whole NS set though, and >give up once they found a v4 address for any of them. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
