On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:45:36AM -0800, Jothan Frakes <[email protected]> wrote a message of 171 lines which said:
> understanding what might be valid on the rightmost side of > addresses. Email addresses? If so, that's an extremely bad example. If you want to test the *syntax* of an email address, just do like RFC 4287 and use the regexp ".+@.+". If you want to test the *content* of an email address, send an email with a cookie. Everything else is broken by design. > used by numerous software developers, programming languages, > browsers (cookies), search engines, security software, and many > other places. And 95 % of these uses are bad ideas: it creates false positives (.CW...) and false negatives (it's not because .COM exists that anything.com has a meaning). _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
