On 1/21/13 7:08 PM, "Joe Abley" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On 2013-01-22, at 11:14, Vernon Schryver <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> Continuing the sarcasm is too much effort, so I'll simply ask why not >>>>> do DNS MX and A requests? (both because of the >>>>>fall-back-to-A-if-no-MX >>> >>>> Please sir, if I run www.images.example.co.uk, can I set a cookie >>>> at images.example.co.uk? How about example.co.uk? Fine Now .co.uk? >> >> It might also be worth noting that co.uk as well as com, org and >> the few other TLDs that I tried just now lack A, AAAA, and MX RRs, >> so a browser could use a DNS test to reject some supercookies. > >I'm not sure it'd be a very good general test, though. For example, > >[krill:~]% dig dk. A +short >193.163.102.24 >[krill:~]% dig co.za MX +short >10 mx2.coza.net.za. >[krill:~]% $ dig +short mx ws. 10 mail.worldsite.ws. There are plenty errors in the public suffix list for Pacific Island countries. I guess the operators of the ccTLDs there, never heard of the PSL. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
