On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul Hoffman wrote: >> We now have two implementation of response rate limiting (RRL). In order for >> it to be widely adopted, an Internet-Draft followed by an RFC would be >> Really Helpful. > > agreed. > >> If this is not possible due to overcommitment on the parts of the authors, I >> would be willing to be primary editor of the draft. This work should begin >> sooner, not after another implementation has started but gone in a different >> direction. > > i have time, and i am willing to upgrade the tech note to an internet > draft and submit it. it's somewhat out of date but the general idea is > present at <http://ss.vix.su/~vixie/isc-tn-2012-1.txt>.
Having the Internet Draft be up-to-date and reflect both implementations would be great. This could easily start off as an Experimental RFC. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
