On Feb 22, 2013, at 10:18 AM, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2013, at 2:58 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> they keep pretending that the DNS attack in Brazil was cache poisoning, >> while it has been widely documented for a long time >> <http://www.securelist.com/en/blog/208193852/The_tale_of_one_thousand_and_one_DSL_modems>. > > I keep running into the "Brazil had an attack that could've been prevented by > DNSSEC" too. Gets boring after a while. > > Has there been any documented attack that would have been prevented by DNSSEC > that one can point to? > http://dnssec-deployment.org/pipermail/dnssec-deployment/2012-July/006003.html I never bothered documenting it fully, but this is one instance…. W > Thanks, > -drc > > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs > -- Consider orang-utans. In all the worlds graced by their presence, it is suspected that they can talk but choose not to do so in case humans put them to work, possibly in the television industry. In fact they can talk. It's just that they talk in Orang-utan. Humans are only capable of listening in Bewilderment. -- Terry Practhett _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
