On Feb 24, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Jo Rhett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Joe Abley wrote: >> I am always wary of assertions of law, made by non-lawyers especially, where >> there's an implicit assumption that there's a single legal system we're >> dealing with, in a single jurisdiction, when the Internet (even ignoring >> Seth Breidbart) is necessarily global and supernational. >> Even with citations from case law in particular justifications, I find this >> line of thinking questionable in a global context. > > I'll take my experience over your thoughts any time ;-) You can find it > questionable all you want. The line of reasoning is valid in a US context, > and it will help bring about more BCP38 players. You said that you weren't a lawyer, and you said these cases were a decade ago. That's a few strikes against "will". > This isn't my legal theory. This is what I've observed used very successfully > in the courtroom, and have taken the considerations of this to various > carriers with great success. I would love to believe you, even if only for the US context which I live in. You have shown no evidence that these "cases" exist, much less that they hinged on BCP38. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
