On Wed, 15 May 2013 17:52:11 -0400
Jared Mauch <[email protected]> wrote:

> If others want, I can look at putting in a config directive.  It
> would be possible to add other RRtypes easily enough that should get
> TCP only that are not commonly used.

I can speak for others, but I would prefer to use the RRL code already
pretty well tested and being implemented in various name server
implementations already.  I would recommend others do so as well.

  <http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits>

Why would someone choose to use your patch over RRL?

John
_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Reply via email to