On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:47:58PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > >> Point taken. But the problem could be in the other direction, the >> ns[0-9.linkedin.com name servers being unable/unwilling to provide >> this access? > > I can neither confirm nor deny anything about this case. More > generally, though, none of that matters: different authoritative name > servers having different serial numbers ought to be no kind of > surprise. > It's not a surprise. The reason that zone is not slaved by Dyn is GSLB services. Andrey _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
