On Aug 22, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:47 PM, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote:
>> A resolver operator deploying an NTA is making an assertion that data behind 
>> a name is safe despite protocol indications that is may not be.
> 
> Where is that stated? I ask, because it would seem that a better description 
> would be that they are asserting that the data behind a name is unprotected 
> by DNSSSEC.

Apologies for using shorthand.  The term 'safe' in my comment meant that it was 
what was intended by the zone editor.

Regards,
-drc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Reply via email to