If it is 9.11, it might be good number to make attack resilience the focus of that version (a good code audit, more robust error-condition response, evolution of RRL and related features, logging that doesn't kill you, etc)
Joao On 15 May 2014, at 01:19, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the next edition of BIND going to be called then, 10 or 11? > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:25 PM, staticsafe <[email protected]> wrote: >> This might be of interest: >> >> https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/208-The_Decline_and_Fall_of_BIND_10.pdf >> -- >> staticsafe >> https://asininetech.com >> _______________________________________________ >> dns-operations mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations >> dns-jobs mailing list >> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs > > > > -- > Website: http://hallambaker.com/ > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
