On 24 Jun 2014, at 17:29, Robert Willmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> In my opinion it's a pity that there is no reserved domainname for the > private use. A few attempts have been made to (sort of) do this. See RFCs 2606, 6761 and 6762. draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-00 is working its way through the IETF. Feel free to comment on that in the dnsop mailing list. Though to some extent, this I-D documents undelegated TLDs that are already in widespread use and are likely to create security or stability problems if they were formally added to the root zone. Perhaps .corp (say) might well become a TLD reserved for private use because so much stuff is currently, but improperly, using it in that way. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
