On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:21:22AM +0100, Simon Munton wrote: > And its been a very sudden change (we can identify the day it started > happening) - which suggests code change, as opposed to a config change > (i.e. it happened in a number of places at about the same time).
no, it may suggest a commonality, but that could also be within the network path. > I said before, the fact remains that servers that are clearly capable of > a larger bufsize but are sticking with a minimum sized one, and so What makes you believe that your larger reponses (fragments?) really make it through? -Peter _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
