On Nov 6, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Casey T. Deccio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Nov 6, 2014, at 5:37 PM, S Moonesamy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> At 13:48 06-11-2014, Casey Deccio wrote: >>> There are clearly two versions of the zone being served by gov.mu servers. >>> If the value of the serials is any indicator of date (as it appears), then >>> udns1.tld.mu and anycast1.irondns.net are serving a version of the zone >>> that is about ten months newer than that being served by ns{1,2,3}.gov.mu >>> (2014110646 vs. 2014010572). >> >> The strange part (re. date) is that I got a serial of 2014010166 on 7 >> October from a resolver. > > Weird. But of course serial values resembling dates don't necessarily mean > that the value is actually derived from a current date. There are instances > where dates were once used but an incremental scheme took over, so the serial > value still resembles a date--though not a current one. In this case, who > knows? > > Casey Looping in Yann and Viv, assuming one of them knows who works the gov delegation. -Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
