Thanks Paul, FWIW, I have been working on this for a while with the Diplo foundation, and I am happy to answer questions (and of course listen to concerns).
Patrik > On 27 nov 2014, at 05:26, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote: > > at: > > http://www.diplomacy.edu/policybriefs > > we see: > > http://www.diplomacy.edu/sites/default/files/DiploFoundation%20Policy%20Brief%20No%204%20WEB.pdf > > which contains: > >> Policy suggestions1 >> • The Internet root zone should be inviolable at >> any time, wherever it may be located. >> • No state should have the jurisdiction to >> prescribe, adjudicate, or enforce policy over >> the Internet root zone. >> • The Internet root zone may only be modified >> through existing procedures or new ones that >> might be introduced in September 2015. >> • The inviolability of the Internet root zone >> should be based on customary law that >> recognises the consistent practice of no >> unilateral interference by the US authorities in >> the content of the Internet root zone. > > ...and more. > > -- > Paul Vixie > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
