Edward Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > But, I do agree with the handwaving argument to date is insufficient and a > bit weak. It is right to challenge the proposal as it stands (as I have > done too). While I an inclined to agree to deprecate qtype=ANY as well as > other elements of the protocol I am also inclined to demand a better > rationale before accepting a document's proposal.
I think outright deprecation might be going too far, especially if it is possible to provide a non-answer to ANY queries that still provides good interoperability. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Fair Isle, Faeroes: South veering west or southwest 5 or 6, decreasing 4 at times. Rough becoming moderate. Showers. Moderate or good, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
