* Patrik Fältström: >> On 20 Mar 2015, at 07:33, Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Are there still situations where a zone owner may have to transition >> the zone to Insecure temporarily to keep it available (or make it >> available again)? What about transfers between registrars? >> >> Are there zone signing mistakes which may need this step? > > With my experience as a dns hosting entity, that is also a registrar, I have > a few comments. > > - There is always a reason why DNS Hosting Provider and/or Registrar > is changed. Most of the time because the old party "did not do their > job". So most of the time something is already broken in the old > setup.
There are also totally benign reasons, like cleanup after M&A or the regular switching of vendors. Overall, these are probably lost in the noise, but on my end, I'm particularly interested in those. > I.e. I see people today in most cases "just do the move" and either > just ignore the issue, or they set the zone to be insecure. In > Sweden with high percentage of validation, taking zone unsigned is > quite normal in the cases where it is easy/possible to do so at the > donating registrar/dns hosting provider. Ah, interesting. Thanks for sharing. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
