On 11 April 2015 at 01:49, Mark E. Jeftovic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Edward Lewis wrote: > >> >> I used to have address records at the apex, with CNAME RRs at the service >> names (except for NS) referring to the apex. It seemed to work, but >> sometimes folks (managers) just didn't like the idea of using CNAME RRs. >> >> The desire for CNAME-at-apex is unrelated, it is an artifact of how cloud >> service providers manage IP addresses for their customers. >> > > I've got a whole section in the book about cnames at the apex. That's > what got me into this thread in the first place.
You queried about if it was appropriate to solicit feedback on the drafts, while I don't know about posting an entire draft of a book (doesnt that cut in to profits?), if this thread is anything to go by then if you post that section to the list i am sure someone will find some pedantic point to comment on/correct as this is a very complicated issue when you go past the simple rule of no cname at the apex and start talking technical details about why. - Mike _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
