There are various signed and deliberately broken zones at SIDNLabs workbench with an explanation of the brokenness: https://workbench.sidnlabs.nl/
- -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 xmpp:[email protected] Op 21 jul. 2015, om 16:04 heeft Keith Mitchell <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > On 07/21/2015 07:48 AM, Edward Lewis wrote: >> Come to think of it, does DNS-OARC have a set of such zones? I have a >> vague memory that this may have been set up once. If not, might this be a >> good idea to provide? (Alongside other test services like reply size as >> described here: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/replysizetest) > > We have I recall various *signed* zones for testing, but not a > deliberately-always-unsigned zone. We'd be happy to implement that if > the community felt it useful. > > Keith > > >> (An idle suggestion.) >> >> On 7/20/15, 22:13, "dns-operations on behalf of Frank Bulk" >> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Does anyone have an zone that will always remain unsigned? >>> verteiltesysteme.net is going to make one, but if there was a second >>> organization that could provide a zone that will never be signed, that >>> would be great as a control. > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > dns-jobs mailing list > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
