In article <[email protected]> you write: >Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We added scope ID support to /etc/resolv.conf in upstream glibc a >> couple of years ago, in 2008. I can easily see that others may not >> have done this, so I agree that there could be problems. > >I did a bit of a survey in 2014 and found that prominent DNS >libraries didn't support link-local addresses back then >http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/2014-July/010035.html >Maybe it's better now :-)
How are they with RFC 4193 ULAs? I've been using a cache at a ULA on my two-segment home network and it seems to work fine. (And why would you use link local rather than ULA for your DNS resolver, anyway?) _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
