> On 26 Sep 2019, at 10:39 am, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Warren Kumari wrote: >> ULAs are very from unique -- there is a huge bias towards things which >> humans can remember / cute names, etc (this is very similar to the >> "IPv6 space is namp / scannable because people name hosts in >> deterministic ways" - see some presentations from Fernando Gont). >> There is a large ULA bias towards fd00::, fd10::, fdfd::, >> fd00:dead:beef:, fd00:bad:coff:ee::. > > Sigh. If people don't follow the spec, not much we can do about that. My > ULAs start with fde3:783e:127d: which I generated with a one line shell script > > $ jot -r -w%02x 10|rs
And BIND’s test prefix is fd92:7065:b8e::/48 which was generated with dd if=/dev/random bs=5 count=1 | od -tx1 for bits [9..48] > Regards, > John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
