On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 3:43 AM Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: > > Verisign are generally responsive, and can get you both root and TLD.
PCH is also very responsive. For root -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7706 -- RFC7706bis should be published soon - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis/ W > > -Bill > > > > On Nov 9, 2019, at 07:28, Mehmet Akcin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hey there > > > > I am trying to improve the performance of tlds in various parts of the > > world as part of a project. > > > > Besides PCH, who else I can get a hold of these days to have local caches > > of DNS? I am focusing on Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Colombia and Chile > > > > Thank you > > > > Mehmet > > -- > > Mehmet > > +1-424-298-1903 > > _______________________________________________ > > dns-operations mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations > > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
