--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 11:50 AM Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 28, 2020, at 3:24 PM, Puneet Sood via dns-operations
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We would be interested in hearing other operator's experience here.
> > Are recursive servers seeing similar behavior from authoritative
> > servers? If yes, are you discarding these responses?
> > Are there authoritative server operators who still need the
> > flexibility afforded by RFC 1035?
>
> Please note that Puneet was asking for other operators' experiences, not the
> opinions of those of us who believe we should tell Google what to do. (And,
> yes, I certainly put myself in the latter category.) I, too, would like to
> hear if other resolver operators see this, and if possible to what extent
> they are seeing it, and if we're really lucky to hear at least a few names
> for which this is happening. The latter is not to name-and-shame, but instead
> to be able to talk to the authoritative operators about what their
> configuration is so that we can maybe guide others away from this path.
Paul is right. We do plan to close this oversight in our
request/response validation. Before doing that we wanted to see how
prevalent it is and not cause unnecessary breakage.
-Puneet
>
> --Paul Hoffman
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
