On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 07:00:40PM -0400, Dave Lawrence wrote: > To me, Andrew's retelling of the facts but for the emphasis. > > There's stated reasons, then there's the motivating reasons. GDPR was > useful in making the argument, but Verisign and the pain of .com were > the real motivation.
verisign was prepared to do what it would take to live in an NSEC-only world, and they were no part of the pressure toward NSEC3. only after NSEC3 became a thing did a number of prior backers of optionality during the NSEC discussions, ask for optionality in the NSEC3 design. do you know for a fact that someone who argued the GDPR case was in fact carrying water for verisign? -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
