It appears that Sascha E. Pollok via dns-operations <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Hello nice people, > >for a few days I have worked on an issue we see with our Bind resolvers of >different >versions regarding resolving addresses under .by. I assume it is not Bind's >fault at all >but the result of a circular dependency in .by after a change of the Auth NS >beginning of >January but let me explain what I see. ...
You are correct, they have a NS dependency loop that will cause all sorts of problems. As you note the results can be very inconsistent depending on the TTL of the glue records and how different DNS software handles the expiring glue. >by. 130511 IN NS dns1.tld.becloudby.com. >becloudby.com. 172800 IN NS u1.hoster.by. >becloudby.com. 172800 IN NS u2.hoster.by. >Does this analysis seem correct and are there maybe any .BY ccTLD people on >this list to >take a look at this? I have worked on this together with Anand Buddhdev so I >want to thank >him for working with me. Always a pleasure. The solution, of course, is "don't do that." A simple fix would be to move the NS for becloudby.com to a name under .com. R's, John _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
