Thanks Paul. As DNSOP chair, we'd like to see a few more folks speak out on the update to 8109. To make it easy to spot the differences between the current document up for adoption and the current RFC8109, this linky link gives the reader a clear breakdown of the changes:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=rfc8109&url2=draft-klh-dnsop-rfc8109bis-06&difftype=--html Please let the DNSOP chairs know your opinions. thanks tim (as DNSOP chair) On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 11:20 AM Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > For all the people on this list who are taking a keen interest in priming: > there is a call in the DNSOP WG about whether draft-klh-dnsop-rfc8109bis > should be adopted as a WG item. This thread has brought up some topics > related to priming that are not covered in RFC 8109. > > --Paul Hoffman > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations >
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
