--- Begin Message ---
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:-
>I do hope that, as a community, we'll continue to steadily streamline
>acceptable NSEC3 parameters (per RFC9276) down to 0 additional
>iterations and short enough salt values (that don't result in additional
>SHA-1 input blocks).
What would be the largest salt length to ensure that such additional input
blocks are not required?
--
Best wishes,
Matthew
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
