--- Begin Message ---
on behalf of the security community let me thank each and every one who has 
specified, implemented, and deployed NXNAME. my original worry was that the 
difference between rcode=3 and ancount=0 might not matter to a web browser but 
it absolutely does matter to security analysts. thanks for bridging the gap.

-- 
P Vixie

On Monday, September 9, 2024 7:50:14 AM PDT Shumon Huque wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:55 AM Jan Včelák <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> > 
> > NS1 will be rolling out an update for Compact Denial of Existence in
> > DNSSEC (draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence) which will
> > change the codepoint for the NXNAME meta record.
> > 
> > The new implementation will use 128 allocated by IANA replacing the
> > private value 65283.
> > 
> > We are currently planning to deploy the change in the following weeks.
> 
> Thank you for the notice Jan.
> 
> I want to note that Cloudflare has also (recently) moved to TYPE 128 for
> NXNAME.
> 
> Shumon Huque






--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations

Reply via email to