On 6/10/14, 18:51 , Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > >>> My concern is about qname minimization: where will it fit here? (It's >>> useless for the stub<->resolver communication) >> >> Stephane is right the, >> when I read the current draft charter all I got out of it was channel >> protection thus I assumed that >> query minimization was out of scope. > > This has such a strong operational component, it should really be done by > dnsop
Full support. It is an elegant yet simple and available solution almost entirely based on operations. I'd love to see the document adopted by DNSOP right away... Gilles -- DNS-LU _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
