On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:04:14AM -0400, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote a message of 80 lines which said:
> And all the mentioned proposals for dns privacy already include > encryption in one way or the other. I clearly disagree. At least two other documented (in Internet-Drafts) proposals do not use encryption at all: * QNAME minimisation * Local (on the end user's machine) resolvers with cache Both minimise data sent upstream, the first leg of data privacy (the second being encryption: you need two legs to walk). See RFC 6973, section 6.1 _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
