Paul, It is a VeriSign patent, its just being shown on the Google patent serach engine
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > > > Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> > Saturday, October 25, 2014 2:24 AM > [Copy to dnsop since the qname minimisation draft is now a WG item at > dnsop.] > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:21:57AM -0700, > David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> <d...@virtualized.org> wrote > > http://www.google.com/patents/EP2611116A1?cl=en > > > importantly, google's policy is to use patents only in defense. i've > requested that they make that explicit in the case of this particular > patent, but, that's a small detail. i believe that query minimization > should proceed as though this patent did not exist, for the good of the > internet economy. (if it fails to reach consensus that's a different > matter, but, let it not be because of this patent.) > > -- > Paul Vixie > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > dn...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
