Warren replied:
>PHB wrote:
>> I don't see using DNSCurve as it is to be an option. At minimum we would
>> need thorough documentation.
>
> Ok, so how about we say that it isn't a solution that we are currently
> considering, but if folk fully document dnscurve / dnscrypt in a
> draft, and bring it to the IETF / DPRIVE we will might consider it
> (and, obviously if it becomes a WG item, change it to meet the our
> requirements...)
Just fyi/fwiw in case it's of use (I'm not advocating any position here and
I note dnscurve is not directly on the DPRIV agenda):
There was a fair amount of list discussion back in 2009 & 2010 wrt dnscurve.
here's pointers to a few of such threads (there's also others)..
[dnsext] DNSCurve Internet-Draft
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:59:33 -0800
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg07149.html
(in)Security Analysis and Catastrophically bad Design: Re: [dnsext] DNSCurve
Internet-Draft
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:15:28 -0800
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg07208.html
[dnsext] Adoption of draft-dempsky-dnscurve-01
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:22:25 -0400
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg08817.html
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dempsky-dnscurve-01
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dempsky-dnscurve/
---
end
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
