On 27/02/15 07:58, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > Perhaps with a reference to the literature on side-channel attacks. But > I agree, unless there are specific attacks that can be spelled out, we > should avoid getting bogged down.
I also agree. At the relevant time (which is not now), I reckon the WG should consider whether some form(s) of padding are worth including or not. And also what kind of guidance to offer about side-channels, which is arguably a different threat. But the problem statement I think should note the potential to re-identify based on at least sets of queries seen with today's DNS. Whether those are down to opening all bookmarks as tabs in one go, or due to re-boot behaviour, I'd say there's a strong enough fingerprint there that the problem statement should not be silent on the topic. S. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
