On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 2/27/15 10:46 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:38:53AM -0500, >> Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote >> a message of 78 lines which said: >> >> BTW are we planning to IETF last call this doc and publish as an RFC >>> or is this internal only? >>> >> >> The charter is silent about it. My goal is certainly to have this >> document published as a RFC, we need clear documentation of privacy >> properties of IETF protocols, like RFC 6973 says. >> >> Now, whether or not an IETF Last Call is necessary, I don't know. >> >> >> > Warren and I have discussed this, though not recently. The consensus (from > the group and from ADs) is published as an RFC. I know a few have felt the > IETF are awash in "problem statements". I just want to know what sort of review to give it. I won't bother with spelling errors and the like for non RFC docs.
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
