exercising line item veto… I think #3 is ready to proceed. The other two suggest fundamental changes to the DNS which need more thought.
manning [email protected] PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102 On 15April2015Wednesday, at 6:08, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > So, the big day has finally arrived -- we are initiating calls for > adoption on the three documents. < http://i.imgur.com/SKX3P8J.gif > > > For *each* of the below documents, please **clearly** state if you > would like DPRIVE to adopt it, or if you think that it will be a > distraction / not helpful. > > 1) Confidential DNS: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wijngaards-dnsop-confidentialdns/ > > 2) Private-DNS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hallambaker-privatedns/ > > 3) TLS for DNS: Initiation and Performance Considerations: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hzhwm-dprive-start-tls-for-dns/ > > > This call for adoption will be wrapping up on April 30th. > At that point we will decide on one or multiple of the documents.... > > W > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
