<chair hat> So, the whole WHOIS topic is an endless blackhole of misery... ICANN has a whole section of their site devoted to it, at https://whois.icann.org/en/ , and *some* of the current issues at: https://whois.icann.org/en/current-issues They even have a whole section of privacy at: https://whois.icann.org/en/privacy
If you'd like to be involved, see: https://whois.icann.org/en/get-involved -- the whole privacy / anonymous subject is currently being hotly debated, and showing up in the news, see: https://www.google.com/webhp?q=ICANN+whois&tbm=nws for examples... This topic, while important, is not about *DNS* privacy, it is about *registration* privacy, so, we won't be discussing it here. I encourage folk who care about this topic to participate in the ICANN process - I attend all the ICANN meetings (and just got back from one on Saturday) - I'll be happy to take you around and introduce you to folk, etc. W </chair hat> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Doug Royer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Every security problem is trivial if you only consider one problem. >> >> ... There >> are very good reasons for people to keep their home addresses private. >> These reasons are vastly more consequential than the piddling problems >> people have with domain names. >> > > So use a different address, I do. > > > -- > > Doug Royer - (http://K7DMR.us / http://DougRoyer.US) > [email protected] > 714-989-6135 > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
