On 07-Jul-2015 08:28 pm, Jiankang Yao <[email protected]> wrote: > > thanks for your kind comments. > About the latency comparison, we will do more experiments and report it to > the WG when it is available.
A quality DNS-over-DTLS implementation will do TLS session resumption, and refresh its session keys only for forward secrecy. -d > > Jiankang Yao > > From: Paul Hoffman > Date: 2015-07-07 22:17 > To: yaojk > CC: dns-privacy > Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] New Version Notification for > draft-zuo-dprive-encryption-over-udp-00.txt > The introduction to this draft implies that it has less latency than > DNS-over-DTLS, but gives no measurements in the body of the draft. Are such > comparisons available so the WG can balance this against the DNS-over-DTLS > proposal? Such a comparison is important, given that what you are proposing > is a new encryption protocol, as compared to using the well-established DTLS. > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
