All,
I posted the preliminary minutes for the dprive meeting. They can be
found here:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/minutes/minutes-93-dprive
Thanks to Stephane for note taking at the last minute, even with flaky
wireless.
To summarize the chairs actions, the first ones were around the
start-tls for DNS draft presented.
On the question of
"Do without a "start TLS"-like approach, just port-based"
Hum for:
Drop negotiation, only (new) port-based: strong signal
Bad idea: silence
I don't know, I don't have enough info
(discussion on what data is necessary: we have none): strong signal
------
On the topic of the "Early Allocation of a port"
Hum:
early allocation of a port:
yes: strong signal <-------
no: silence
-----
During the presentation on the evaluation document, it became obvious
that many people had not read the draft.
The question was raised to see
"Who finds this useful and should be adopted"
Hum:
useful and should be adopted: more than 5 :-)
("May be they watched the movie and did not read the book")
------
The rough consensus in the room was to
request an early port allocation request; and to
start with a new port directly.
The chairs will need to go back on think on the evaluation document.
thanks
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
