Quick question: What document is "the document"? On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote:
> Hi all, > > The chairs believe that there is sufficient interest in the working > group for early allocation of a port for dns over TLS, following RFC > 7120. > > Looking at the eligibility criteria in RFC 7120 Section 2: > 2a) we expect this port to be a system port and therefore the IANA > policy for it is IETF Review. > 2b) we believe the document has adequately described the protocol. > 2c) we believe the document has reached a good level of stability. > 2d) The Working Group chairs and Area Directors (ADs) judge that there is > sufficient interest in the community for early (pre-RFC) implementation > and deployment, or that failure to make an early allocation might lead to > contention for the code point in the field. > > > If you violently disagree with this plan, please let us know no later > than Friday the 14th. > > W > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > -- Colm
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
