Shane, > > Of course, feedback and reviews are greatly appreciated. > > IIRC this seemed completely uncontroversial. :)
Thanks. There were some comments whether padding at a different layer would be more appropriate, but - again - this would be subject to the "using protocol". > Was there an idea to make a separate document with some > recommendations > as to how to actually *use* this, or is the idea just to add this to > the toolbox for protocol implementations? The idea was to have separate drafts for this. One draft creating the "tool", but not specifying how to use it, and then subsequent draft(s) specifying how this should be used (such as the DTLS / TLS drafts?) Alex _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
