I support the adoption by DPRIVE and I will comment on it and review it.
Initial comment about Section 4:
However, padded DNS messages MUST NOT exceed the respective
UDP payload size (see Section 6.2.3 and 6.2.4 of [RFC6891]).
The above text is potentially confusing for when the use of the padding
option will be by a DNS-over-TLS (TCP) request (even though the RFC 6891
reference is very helpful).
Could it be written instead like the below:
However, padded DNS messages MUST NOT exceed the number of
octets specified in the requestor¹s Payload Size field encoded
in the RR Class Field (see Sections 6.2.3 and 6.2.4 of [RFC 6891]).
Tiny nit: ³octets² is spelled ³octects² throughout the draft.
Allison
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
