Whoa, very cool, and remarkably small code change.

I'm not able to test it here / at the moment, but hope to after I
return from Tokyo.


W

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/11528/
>
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=blobdiff;f=epan/dissectors/packet-dns.c;h=cedd7d9154cd64a472514d65dc4595717e60b7ec;hp=d0a018666db7039fdf93ac978fffeb12038953f7;hb=8ebc1084b296155098295e36587d89415e3604f1;hpb=f4921c10e653389afc4ecd8e951f786f22528324
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to