On Friday, November 27, 2015 10:23 PM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote: > ... > > 1) The draft fails to include a recommendation to "fallback to DNS over TLS" > > when messages are too big for DTLS and UDP. This fallback recommendation > > was pretty much the consensus that I heard in Yokohama. I understand that > > we could in the future get DTLS extensions for supporting large messages, > > but these are not ready yet, and in the mean-time falling back to TCP is a > > pretty well established strategy. > > It's already discussed in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls- > 03
My bad. Yes, you are right, I somehow missed it when reading the draft. And I agree with your proposed resolution of the other 2 issues. -- Christian Huitema _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
